Tagged: english major

Now my charms are all o’erthrown

Andy Jones As Prospero in The Tempest; photo by Kent BarrettI was doing a little web development wizardry this afternoon for a customer, effortlessly changing fonts and colors and kerning on a site to many “oohs” and “ahs.” This is the sizzle-without-the-steak side of programming: the difficult and interesting things about the project have unfolded slowly, with many wrong turns and blind alleys, and would be incredibly dull for a non-developer to see. But customers like to see colors, and colors are easy to deliver.

In the course of changing the font of a page from Verdana to Arial (I’ll leave it to the font experts to argue the relative merits of each), I made a simple but perhaps telling typo, calling out “Ariel” (which isn’t a valid font name on most systems) where I meant “Arial.”

“Oh, like ‘The Little Mermaid’,” said my customer.

“No,” I said, “like the fairy. From Shakespeare, in … ”

And there was that horrible feeling of a gap in the brain; I couldn’t for the life of me fill in the title of the play in which Ariel appears. I sputtered out Prospero and Calliban, “Shakespeare’s last play,” “shipwrecked on an island … ” but I just couldn’t dredge it up.

“‘Midsummer Night’s Dream’?” my customer helpfully suggested.

“No, no, that was Oberon … ”

“Not ‘The Tempest’?”

And of course, that was it, ‘The Tempest’, at one time my second-favorite of Shakespeare’s plays (“Lear” has long been my favorite, for the king’s mad soliloquy in the storm). Dejected, I said, “I should be drummed out of the league of English majors for forgetting that.”

“It just shows how far you’ve come,” my customer said, probably referring to my earlier CSS tricks.

But I would much rather forget all of the CSS, JavaScript, HTML, XML, Java, and LotusScript cluttering my brain to make room again for Shakespeare, Whitman, Dickinson, and Faulkner. (My employer, it goes without saying, does not share this sentiment.) I’ve forgotten more literature in the last twenty years than I’ve learned programming tricks, I’m sure, all of those poems and paragraphs squeezed out by practical knowledge and the details of getting and spending. The world is too much with us, Wordsworth complained, and though he would rather that we made room for Nature in our hearts, I’d rather be able to make room for words again in my head.

This lapse worried me a little when it happened; it had that tip-of-the-tongue pattern of early senility. But I’ve always tended toward forgetfulness, at least about things that aren’t daily concerns, so I’m not too concerned about drifting into oblivion quite yet. What I think it really points to is that the values that a liberal education in general, and literature in particular, espouse are not those that we live by once we’re out of college. Time especially, so easily filled with work, laundry, bills, and supervising children, is divided up into so many little pieces that I can no longer imagine sitting down with ‘The Tempest,’ or ‘Paradise Lost,’ or even ‘The Wasteland,’ and becoming immersed again in words well-constructed.

There ought to be a sort of recertification program for English majors, where we go back to all the required reading of our undergrad years and become familiar again with the things we used to know. Some of the books I read then and didn’t really understand–”The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie,” “Mr. Polly,” anything by Henry James–might make a lot more sense with a few years and disappointments behind me. And though it might not make me more productive than a class on the latest techniques in jQuery and HTML5 development, a close reading of ‘The Tempest’ might save my soul, or at least my brain.

you’ve got questions, I’ve got answers

As oracular devices go, Internet search engines are a little better than reading sheep entrails and a little worse than the I Ching. The Internet is so full of bad and misleading information, that unless you already know what you’re looking for you’ll be easily duped. And because most search engines add a little “wisdom of the crowds” (or the “none of us is as dumb as all of us” principal) to their algorithms, bad information tends to reinforce more bad information. In most cases, you’re better off asking a person–your father (who might lie to you), the guy at the end of the bar (who will definitely lie to you), or a librarian (who will certainly not lie to you, but might giggle when you’re not looking)–or trying to find the answer in a book.

Case in point: this site should be flooded with searches for things like heartbreakingly beautiful short stories and incredibly astute political commentary. Alas, such is not the case. Indeed, some of the searches that have landed people here are a little puzzling indeed.

So, in the spirit of public service, here’s a little help for people who’ve wandered here and have probably not found the answers they wanted.

sailor’s destination in a yeats poem

As noted earlier, the L.A. Times crossword from last weekend has puzzled a lot of people. I thought the traffic from this search would die down quickly, but it’s been steady. I find myself equally bemused and peeved to see it in the analytics logs.

The answer is Byzantium. But you get extra points if you thought the answer might be Innisfree.

different kind of literature

Yup, there are different kinds, some more so than others.

how to be a successful english major

Simple, really. Key definitions to learn would be “oxymoron,” “irony,” “sardonicism,” and “mordancy.”

novel story

All novels are stories, but not all stories are novels.

whoopie pie recipe, gingerbread, healthy

Refer to the answer above. “Oxymoron” applies here as well.

fluffernutter whoopie pie recipe

Much preferred to anything “healthy.”

poem of the sky was lovely, dark and deep but i’ve far to go until i sleep

Close! Please try again.

ronnie scotts bar cover charge

It all depends on when you go. Go to the DJ show tonight, and it will set you back £5. Saturday night, £7.50. New Year’s Eve will cost £60. But Sunday afternoon is only £3 if you bring your own horn. This is the site you’re really looking for.

i love ibm song

Don’t we all? Yet somehow I’ve never felt moved to vocalize my adoration of WebSphere and Lotus Notes. But, of course, IBM’s praises have indeed been sung:

our reputation sparkles like a gem.
we’ve fought our way through
and new fields we’re sure to conquer, too,
for thee ever onward IBM!

iron cage of bureaucracy madoff

I think that’s a great idea!

raymond carver driving the heart

Close again! I think you’re looking for Jason Brown, though.

detailed coherent paragraph on how learning from and aesop fable experience is a good method of teaching a lesson

Remember, your homework is due at the beginning of class. More info here.

I do hope this has been helpful!

What the space program needs are more English majors

When asked if the United States needs more education programs to get students interested in math and science, Apollo 11 astronaut Michael Collins has an interesting answer:

We definitely have a national problem in that kids seem to be going for money rather than what they consider ‘nerdy’ careers. Other countries are outstripping us in the quality and quantity of math and science grads, and this can only hurt in the long run. But a liberal arts education, particularly English, is a good entry point no matter what the later specialization. I usually talk up English.

English majors? In space? An intriguing idea indeed …

When people look at my resumé, they are a little perplexed by the education section: BA in English and sociology, MA in American Studies, Chester E. Eisinger prize for an essay on Nathaniel Hawthorne. Why computers? they ask.

My stock answer is usually “because no one pays you to be an expert on Nathaniel Hawthorne.”

This is only partially true. At the time I earned my MA, the job market for the professoriat was lousy: far too many PhDs chasing far too few teaching jobs. And though I’ve made a little money with my writing, and have a real contract for an actual book at the moment, it’s certainly not enough to live on. But that doesn’t mean that my English major identity is at all useless, nor even that it has been subsumed into a computer science interest. In fact, I draw on my liberal arts education daily in my personal and professional life.

The thing that you learn from a liberal arts education is how to learn things; it’s a meta-education. To be a successful English major, you need to be curious, creative, and clever, and highly distrustful of expert opinion. Synthetic thinking is crucial, whether you’re trying to understand how Coleridge used German Romantic philosophy or where Hawthorne fits into the historiography of early New England. English majors see the connections between disparate things, and build quick and tenuous bridges across deep ravines; they also take joy in blowing up those bridges, deconstructing the received interpretations, and offering playful and tentative readings. They need to be nimble in their thinking, passionately committed to the power of language but comfortable with ambiguity.

While it may seem that literature translates poorly to software, there are a lot of habits of mind that can be ported quite effectively. Parsimony, for example, is valuable in both poetry and code: distilling a complex thought into a sixteen-line sonnet is not so different from stripping a function down to a few lines of reusable code. Code reviews are a lot like literary criticism: does this piece of writing succeed in what it sets out to do? Are there underlying problems in the narrative, contexts that the author fails to consider, unnecessary paragraphs that complicate things unhelpfully?

A programmer’s customers–the people who give us requirements for our code–are best understood as unreliable narrators. They tell us stories, but their narratives are full of gaps and misprisions. Beneath their bare statements are deep wells of longing and frustration, requirements not expressed that we need to tease out and expose if our applications will be successful. English majors have learned how to inhabit the minds of Dickens’ menagerie of characters, so climbing into the thought processes of a junior assistant for regional marketing development and getting them to tell us what they really want isn’t so alien.

Early on, English majors learn all about negative capability (and its dark cousin, Doublethink). The ability to hold two contradictory ideas without going mad is essential not only for maintaining one’s sanity in the business world, but also in distributed software. A liberal arts education teaches you to see the faces and the vase, the lady and the skull, which is critical for seeing your code as a service and a client.

Most importantly, English majors learn to be comfortable with tentative readings. Stories unfold slowly, poems twist at the end, what you think is a ghost turns out to be a mad governess, or maybe it really is a ghost after all. As programmers, we can bid adieu to our clever solutions when they prove unworkable, and switch platforms when non-technical decisions force us to abandon our old ways. We know how to learn new things, and are experts at skimming the index for the nuggets of knowledge that get the job done; paradigm shifts don’t frighten us.

If I had been a computer science major in the late 1980s (I don’t recall if my college even had a program), I would probably have spent a lot of time on COBOL, C, and mainframe architectures. There would have been some theoretical work in algorithms that I could imagine being useful, but a lot of the concrete skills taught would now be largely useless: I’d have had to learn Java or .NET and XML after the fact anyway. As an English major, I came to learning new technologies with an open mind and flexible habits.

I think that’s what Michael Collins means: the technical details can be learned by someone who has been trained to learn things, and can be unlearned just as quickly.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin